Often this is where editors will want reviewers to state their recommendation - see the next section - but otherwise this area is best reserved for communicating malpractice such as suspected plagiarism, fraud, unattributed work, unethical procedures, duplicate publication, bias or other conflicts of interest. Of course, the research similarities may be so great that they render the work unoriginal and you have no choice but to recommend rejection. Wiley under consideration. Two weeks later, the status was updated from "All reviewers Assigned" to "Manuscript under consideration", and four days later, to a blank Stage as shown in yours. This may be appropriate but only if authors report on how the image has been edited (e.g. [CDATA[// > Indoor Air Wiley .5 26 submission status under review . .Submission Status:Under Review This submission is under consideration and cannot be edited. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. The title should contain the relevant SEO terms early on. At the other sister journals, it is a crap shoot as to what this means. on 30 Mar, 2017. When preparing a manuscript, authors should refer to a recent issue of the Journal and follow the detailed instructions given below. Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? What's more, you don't then need to read any further. The chances of. But today suddenly the status changed back to Awaiting Reviewer Assignment again. It has been like that for a few days without any email notification. Accepted Author's Manuscript (AAM). If methodology is less of an issue, it's often a good idea to look at the data tables, figures or images first. Communicate more effectively with this specially curated collection of easy templates and expert tips for 10+ situations when . 5 Cambridge Court. Different assembly mechanisms of leaf epiphytic and endophytic bacterial communities underlie their higher diversity in more diverse forests. Highlight important findings sufficiently? Manuscript submission Articles submitted to the journal should be original contributions, which are not under consideration for any other publication at the same time. context to reach favorable conservation status of the species and fulfill the criteria of a "good ecological status" under the demands of the European WFD for riverine ecosystems in Hessen and other Central European regions. Author, 1 C. D. Author 2 and E. F . HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Often you can't see these until you log in to submit your review. This helps developing researchers improve their work and explains to the editor why you felt the manuscript should not be published. If major revisions are required, try to indicate clearly what they are. AWS publishes research exploring theoretical, experimental, and practical approaches that advance fundamental understanding and application of all aspects of water works and any source water that could conceivably become a . Your review should ultimately help the author improve their article. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. Rt 395 in ct 1 . Hello, I have conducted analysis where the K-W and S-W have come out as p. How was your publication experience with BBRJ in terms of peer review and reviewer comments. This has enough data points to make sure the data are reliable. Don't just give a short, cursory remark such as 'great, accept'. Headache prides itself on a rapid, full and fair peer review. Read Wiley's Top 10 Publishing Ethics Tips for Authors here. Can you just throw some light on the process? Academic research should be replicable, repeatable and robust - and follow best practice. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection with the possibility of resubmission this is most relevant where substantial, major revision is necessary. 1, 2 As a consequence, there is an urgent need for therapies that could delay or disrupt the progression to dementia. Our results also underpin the usefulness to combine eDNA with SDM in an iterative . Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Editors are busy people and things can easily slip through the cracks. I want to publish a paper at the EI-Compendex conference, please suggest a conference with a high acceptance rate. Agrifood Toscana Fatturato, //-->