Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Overall, spectacular lens. My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Taking images at this focal length from the city will swell issues with gradients, especially when shooting towards the light dome. Yeah I agree that the sentiment that they were designed to be used stopped down is wrong as they were designed to be used wide open because they had to be for speed (my point above). (AVX). But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. "That is why when SLRs came along the 200mm became the big seller and the 135 was largely forgotten"Did you notice that this 135mm F2 lens on an APS-C camera is more or less equivalent to a 200mm F2.8 lens on an FF camera ?So this lens can be seen as the 200mm F2.8 lens for APS-C camera users. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. Now i have the f2.8 version, and while the resolution is better it s under no circumstance as good as the f/4 one. Trully sharp accross whole frame from f2 on 5d. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej (purchased for $900), reviewed November 2nd, 2015 Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. But you raise the exact point, that primes should be chosen with a 2x factor. I'll walk you through all this inc. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with ED standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the ultra multi-coated optics. I was blown away when I loaded the photos into my computer. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. It is fantastic on my old 5d. PRICE. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! I bought a Fotasy Minolta MD->EOSM adapter off ebay for $11, and then for about $20 each on craigs list really sharp, well built Minolta MC 28mm f2.8, 50mm f1.4, and 135mm f2.8 lenses that turned out to be great for astrophotography. (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. You're sour grapes man, you wish it were you who wrote the article. CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. Yes the Samyang is good and yes there are lenses with bad bokeh. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. The best ones listed below serve well with a one stop reduction, and some require two or even three stops. I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. I'm not a fan of the large hood. And with our first long lenses we were all impressed were we not? It's kinda curious how topsy turvy things have gotten since this article, just 4 years later, I think 135mm is possibly more niche than ever yet Samyang finally delivered an AF version of this concept at a lighter weight for E mount, but also at a higher price. Beware others critical comments here about how flat these images look, the author has chosen specific topics and viewpoints to highlight f2 with this lens, so see the wow review for what it is please and the negative comments need placing in context. It's a trade off. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. Nevertheless, it performs excellently on most star fields, and is too cheap not to acquire. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 It just doesn't get any better than this! When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. What's it got and what's it like to use? After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. There is no such thing, in my opinion. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. (purchased for $650), reviewed June 6th, 2008 BirdDog P240 40X NDI PTZ Camera. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. You get what you get.#4: Cat in Underbrush.That's pretty good.#5: Woman with Blanket.It's like a snapshot. wew.. How's that for an endorsement? In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint. When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. Equipment used was an astromodified Canon 700D, Samyang 135mm f2, SkyTech Triband filter, Star Adventurer 2i, ZWO mini finder with ASI120MM, guiding with PHD2 and polar alignment using sharpcap. However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. I am telling them - don't! Amazing colours, contrast, bokeh, everything! Check out some of the photos he took. Holiday Savings $50 . But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? Does this work well with any of the 1.4x / 1.7x / 2.0x Teleconverters (extenders / barlows)? Fit and finish are first-rate as well, with very smooth manual focus operation, and very fast autofocus on the camera. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. parts of your main subject extend beyond the DOF range it will never look flat. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. :). 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. If you have pictures taken using the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens, please feel free to share your results in the comments section (links to Astrobin, Flickr or your personal gallery are fine). Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. This gives me the power of 162x, which is barely sufficient for my 420mm fl APO astrograph at full camera resolution. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! I own Samyang 135 f2 for Nikon Mount and indeed it is incredible value lens. In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. It could really use an update to its coatings. Probably you could get a very similar image with a 85mm 1.8. If they could make 135 f2 lighter version with AF for Sony and price is slightly under Sigma 135 /1.8 and obviously Batis 135 2.8 it could sell like hotcakes. It improves slightly stopped down. This lens has only two drawbacks. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. RATING. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. Super sharp from f2. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. This is so annoying that I intend to replace the Canon lens cap with a Tamron cap. Here is a short list of great astrophotography targets to shoot at 135mm with this lens: Below, is an incredible example of the types of projects possible with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 lens. Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. Fast focus, Super sharp, Well built, Awesome for low light. Used with a FF body the DOF can be unforgiving, but if you nail focus the results can be magnificent. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 Yes there's bokeh. They're heavy, and expensive, but you can carry one lens instead of three, and can vary the compression and field of view to a significant degree - from nearly normal, to long portrait focal lengths. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true.

Jean Reno And Natalie Portman Reunion, Skar Audio Break In Period, Ez Connect Transfer Switch Installation, Articles C